Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four-year deal worth an average of $2.4 million per season to continue playing hockey? It seems unfair to fault him for securing a limited no-trade clause as part of the agreement.
Given the circumstances, it’s likely that Kampf will either find himself with the Marlies or nowhere else in the league. Accepting this reality might be the most practical step for him moving forward.
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
David Kampf's four-year contract with a no-trade clause reflects a fair deal, but realistically, his future probably lies with the Marlies or not playing at all.
Would you like a more formal or informal tone for this summary?